Microsoft Versus Psychic Friends

In the course of a recent Microsoft Access programming project, we had three difficult technical problems where we decided to call a support hotline for advice. This article compares the two support numbers we tried: Microsoft Technical Support and the Psychic Friends Network. As a result of this research, we have come to the following conclusions:

  1. that Microsoft Technical Support and the Psychic Friends Network are about equal in their ability to provide technical assistance for Microsoft products over the phone;
  2. that the Psychic Friends Network has a distinct edge over Microsoft in the areas of courtesy, response time, and cost of support; but
  3. that Microsoft has a generally better refund policy if they fail to solve your problem.

In the paragraphs that follow, we will detail the support calls we made and the responses we received from each support provider. We will follow this with a discussion of the features provided by each support provider so that readers can do their own rankings of the two services.

Our research began when we called Microsoft regarding a bug that we had detected when executing queries which pulled data from a Sybase Server into Microsoft Access. If we used the same Access database to query two databases on the same server, we found that all of the queries aimed at the second database that we queried were sent to the first database that we had queried. This problem existed no matter which database we queried first.

Dan called Microsoft’s Technical Solutions Line, gave them $55, and was connected with an official Microsoft Access technical support person. As Dan began to explain the problem, the support person interrupted him, and told him that since it was clear that it was not just a problem with Access but with the two programs together, Microsoft would not try to help us.

They did,however, have a consultant referral service with which he would be glad to connect us. Dan then asked if we could have our $55 refunded, since Microsoft was not going to try to answer to our question. The tech support person responded by forwarding Dan to the person in charge of giving refunds.

The person officially in charge of giving refunds took Dan’s credit card info again, after which Dan asked about the referral service.

It was too late, however — the refund folks could not reconnect Dan with the tech support guy he’d been talking with, nor could he put Dan in touch with the referral service hotline. End of Call One.

Our second call came when Dan was creating some line graphs in Microsoft Access. Microsoft Access actually uses a program called Microsoft Graph to create its graphs, and this program has a “feature” that makes the automatic axis scale always start the scale at zero. If all of your data are between 9,800 and 10,000 and you get a scale of 0 to 10,000, your data will appear as a flat line at the top of your graph — not a very interesting chart.

Since Dan was writing Visual Basic code to create the graphs, he wanted to be able to use Visual Basic code to change the graph scaling, but he could not find anything in the help files that would tell him how to do this. After working with Microsoft Graph for a while, Dan concluded that it probably didn’t have the capability that he needed, but he decided to call Microsoft just to make sure.

Dan described his problem to the technical support person, whom we’ll call Microsoft Bob. Microsoft Bob said he’d never gotten a call about Microsoft Graph before. He then left Dan on hold while he went to ask another support person how to use Microsoft Graph.

Microsoft Bob came back with the suggestion that Dan use the online help.

Dan, however, had already used the online help, and didn’t feel that this was an appropriate answer for a $55 support call.

Microsoft Bob didn’t give up, though. He consulted the help files and learned to change the graph scale by hand and then began looking for a way to do this via code.

After Microsoft Bob had spent about an hour on the phone with Dan learning how to use Microsoft Graph, Dan asked for a refund since he had no more time to spend on the problem.

Microsoft Bob refused the refund, however. He said he wouldn’t give up, and told Dan that he would call back the next week.

Microsoft Bob did call back the following week to admit failure. He could not help us. However, he couldn’t give us a refund either. Microsoft Bob’s supervisor confirmed Microsoft Bob’s position. While Microsoft Technical Support hadn’t solved our problem, they felt that a refund was inappropriate since Microsoft Technical Support had spent a lot of time not solving our problem.

Dan persisted, however, explaining that if Microsoft Bob actually knew the program, he would have been able to give Dan a response much sooner.

The supervisor made no guarantees, but he instructed Dan to check his credit card bill at the end of the month. The supervisor explained that if Dan saw that the charge was still there at the end of the month,then he would know that he hadn’t gotten a refund. End of Call Two.

Our third call to Microsoft involved using the standard file save dialog from within Microsoft Access to get a file name and directory string from a user in order to save an exported file. The documentation didn’t make it clear how to do this using Visual Basic code within Microsoft Access, and Dan decided to call Microsoft to ask if and how a programmer could do this.

The technical support person he reached told him he was asking about a pretty heavy programming task. He cheerily informed Dan that he’d called the wrong number and advised Dan to call help for Visual Basic, not Access ($195 instead of $55). This technical support person was extraordinarily helpful in getting Dan his refund. End of Call Three.

Stymied by our responses from Microsoft, we decided to try another service provider, the Psychic Friends Network.

There are several noticeable differences between Microsoft and the Psychic Friends Network. Microsoft charges a flat rate per “solution,” which is a single problem and can be handled in multiple phone calls. As described above, Microsoft may or may not issue a refund of their fee if they fail to provide a solution for your problem.

The Psychic Friends Network charges a per minute fee. They do not offer a refund if they cannot solve your problem. However, unlike Microsoft, they will not charge you extra if they provide more than one solution per call.

We decided to test the Psychic Friends Network by asking them the same questions that we had asked Microsoft Technical Support.

We called them and were quickly connected with Ray, who was very courteous and helpful. Like Microsoft Bob, Ray quickly informed us that he wasn’t fully up to date on the programs that we were working with, but he was willing to help us anyway.

We started off with our first problem: making a connection from Microsoft Access to two different Sybase Servers. Ray worked hard on this problem for us. He sensed that there was a problem with something connecting, that something wasn’t being fulfilled either in a sexual, spiritual or emotional way. Ray also identified that there was some sort of physical failure going on that was causing the problem.”

Do you mean that there’s some sort of bug?” we asked.

Ray denied that he knew about any sort of bug in the software.

“Are you sure there’s not a bug?” we asked.

Ray insisted that he did not know of any bug in the software, although he left open the possibility that there could be some bug in the software that he did not know about.

All in all, Ray did not do much to distinguish himself from Microsoft Technical Support. He wasn’t able to solve our problem for us, and he wasn’t able to confirm or deny that a bug in Microsoft Access was causing the problem.

We then asked Ray our question about using Visual Basic to set the axes of a chart. Ray thought hard about this one. Once again he had the sense that something just wasn’t connecting, that there was some sort of physical failure that was causing our problem.

“Could it be that it’s your computer that’s the problem?” he asked.

“Is this something that happens just on your computer, or have you had the same problem when you’ve tried to do the same thing on other computers?”

We assured Ray that we had the same problem on other computers, then he asked again, “This physical failure that you’re talking about, do you mean that there’s some sort of bug?”

Once again he assured us that there wasn’t a bug, but that he didn’t know how to solve our problem. “I sense there’s some sort of sickness here, and you’re just going to have to sweat it out. If you’d like, you can call back tomorrow. We have a couple of guys here, Steve and Paul, and they ‘re much better with computer stuff than I am.”

To conclude our research, we asked Ray about our problem with the standard file dialog box.

“It’s the same thing as the last one,” he told us. “There’s some sort of sickness here, and you’re just going to have to sweat it out. There is a solution,though,and you’re just going to have to work at it until you get it.”

Conclusions:

In terms of technical expertise, we found that a Microsoft technician using Knowledge Base was about as helpful as a Psychic Friends reader using Tarot Cards. All in all, however, the Psychic Friends Network proved to be a much friendlier organization than Microsoft Technical Support.

While neither group was actually able to answer any of our technical questions, the Psychic Friends Network was much faster than Microsoft and much more courteous.

Which organization is more affordable is open to question. If Microsoft does refund all three “solutions” fees, then they will be the far more affordable solution provider, having charged us no money for having given us no assistance. However, if Microsoft does not refund the fees for our call regarding Microsoft Graph, then they will have charged us more than 120% of what the Psychic Friends charged, but without providing the same fast and courteous service that Psychic Friends provided.

Gates: “Quake Was Just a Sample of Our Power”

In a warning to the US Government, Microsoft demonstrated their power by launching a major earthquake in Seattle.

Bill Gates issued a statement from the Microsoft “Campus”. “The time for talk is over. We will not be broken apart. We have demonstrated our power. We will not hesitate to use it again. Heed our warning. We have spoken.”

President George W. Bush responded from the White House, “Gosh. I don’t know about this. Ask Dick.”

Computer experts dismiss Microsoft’s warning. “Naw, it was just a demo. Microsoft does these great demos, but until they get to about release 3.0 the programs won’t work. They’ll just keep crashing. I mean, you might be able to break a few windows, but to take on Washington you’ll need to be able to drop the Lincoln Memorial all the way to the molten center of the earth.”

Bill Gates and Hell

Bill Gates passed away and found himself in the ante-room between Heaven and Hell. The admitting Angel was surprised to see him and said there was some sort of mix-up in his file. After unsuccessfully trying to solve the mix-up, the Angel told Bill Gates that they would allow him to make his own choice as to whether he went to Heaven or Hell.

Gates was then seated in front of two computers: one labeled “Heaven” and one labeled “Hell.”

The “Heaven” monitor showed streets paved in gold with many smiling people gathered in clusters singing beautiful hymns. Lovely harp music filled the air and the sky was filled with soft, puffy white clouds.

The “Hell” monitor showed a white sand beach with a sparkling blue ocean gently lapping on the shore. There were many beautiful young women in tiny bikini’s strolling the beach, lying in the sand and playing volleyball and having a lot of fun.

Gates looked at both scenes for awhile and then thought to himself, “Hell really does look pretty great.” He told the Angel he chose to go to Hell, and he was immediately sent down.

Quite awhile later, the admitting Angel was making his customary rounds of Heaven and Hell, checking on the daily routines. He saw Bill Gates and went over to speak to him. Gates was chained to a wall. He was dirty and thin. His body was covered in festering sores and he was groaning in great pain. The Angel said, “You know, I could not understand why you chose Hell when you could have gone to Heaven. You, of course, are suffering the consequences of Hell.”

Gates looked at the Angel with tormented eyes and said, “Where are the beautiful girls? Where is the white sand beach and the sparkling blue ocean? Where is all the fun?”

The Angel said, “Oh, that. Well, you were looking at the MicroHell Screen Saver…”

The Microsoft Approach on the Firing Range

It was decided by Microsoft during a brilliant brainstorming session that military service would improve the skills and discipline of their finest technician. So off to boot camp he went. At the rifle range he was given some instruction, a rifle, and bullets. He fired several shots at the target.

The report came from the target area that all attempts had completely missed the target.

The Microsoft tech looked at his rifle and then at the target again. “Hmmm,” he thought, “I’ll get to the bottom of this in no time.” He looked at the rifle again, and then at the target again. He pointed his still loaded rifle at the ground in front of him and fired. A cloud of dust kicked up, and a little dimple was left therein the dust.

“Yep, it’s working,” he concluded.

The technician yelled out to the others at the target end, “The rifle is in working order, and the bullet seems to be leaving this end just fine. The trouble must be at your end!”

Microsoft to Purchase God

Microsoft Corporation today announced its intent to purchase, copyright, and upgrade God Himself. The new product would be named, predictably enough, “Microsoft God,” and would be available to consumers sometime in late 2015. “Too many people feel separated from God in today’s world,” said Dave McCavaugh, director of Microsoft’s new Religions division. “Microsoft God will make our Lord more accessible, and will add an easy, intuitive user interface to Him, making Him not only easier to find, but easier to communicate with.”

The new Microsoft Religions line will be expanded to include a multitude of add-on products to Microsoft God, including: Microsoft Crusades: This conversion product will bring all worshipper accounts and prayer files over from previous versions of God, or from competing products like Buddha or Allah. Microsoft God for the World Wide Web: This product ties Microsoft God with Microsoft Internet Information Server, making our Lord accessible from the World Wide Web using a standard Web browser interface. It introduces several new Web technologies, including Dynamic Salvation and Active Prayer Pages (APP). Donations for the poor can be donated via a Secure Alms Server.

Microsoft Prayers: Using a Windows-based WYSIWYG interface, this product will allow worshippers to construct effective prayers in a minimum of time. A Secure Prayer Channel technology allows guaranteed delivery of the prayer to Microsoft God servers, and Prayer Wizards enable users to construct new types of prayers with a minimum learning curve.

Microsoft Savior: This product will allow worshippers to transfer their sins to its internal Vice Database. After a preset interval, the product will erase itself from the user’s system and establish a clear line of secure communications to the user’s Microsoft God server.

Additionally, Microsoft is expected to announce a line of complimentary products for the new Religions line, which will enhance the functionality of the Microsoft God server product by providing a customized user interface. These interfaces will be based on popular religious sects, allowing worshippers to interact with the new God product in much the same way as the previous version. This line is expected to include Microsoft Islam, Microsoft Catholicism, Microsoft Judaism (incompatible with Microsoft Savior), etc.

Microsoft TV Dinner Product Insert

You must first remove the plastic cover. By doing so you agree to accept and honor Microsoft rights to all TV dinners. You may not give anyone else a bite of your dinner (which would constitute an infringement of Microsoft’s rights). You may, however, let others smell and look at your dinner and are encouraged to tell them how good it is.

If you have a PC microwave oven, insert the dinner into the oven.

Set the oven using these keystrokes:

<mstv.dinn.//08.5min@50%heat//>

Then enter:

<ms//start.cook_dindin/yummy|/yum~yum:-)gohot#cookme>.;

If you have a Mac oven, insert the dinner and press start. The oven will set itself and cook the dinner.

Be forewarned that Microsoft dinners may crash, in which case your oven must be restarted. This is a simple procedure. Remove the dinner from the oven and enter:

<ms.nodarn.good/tryagainagain/again.crap>

This process may have to be repeated. Try unplugging the microwave and then doing a cold reboot. If this doesn’t work, contact your hardware vendor.

Many users have reported that the dinner tray is far too big, larger than the dinner itself, having many useless compartments, most of which are empty. These are for future menu items. If the tray is too large to fit in your oven you will need to upgrade your equipment.

Dinners are only available from registered outlets, and only the chicken variety is currently produced. If you want another variety, call Microsoft Help and they will explain that you really don’t want another variety. Microsoft Chicken is all you really need.

Microsoft has disclosed plans to discontinue all smaller versions of their chicken dinners. Future releases will only be in the larger family size. Excess chicken may be stored for future use, but must be saved only in Microsoft approved packaging.

Microsoft promises a dessert with every dinner after ’98. However, that version has yet to be released. Users have permission to get thrilled in advance.

Microsoft dinners may be incompatible with other dinners in the freezer, causing your freezer to self-defrost. This is a feature, not a bug. Your freezer probably should have been defrosted anyway.

Things that Would Change if Microsoft Built Cars

  • A particular year’s model would not be available for at least 2 years until after it was scheduled to go into production.
  • Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.
  • Occasionally your car would just die for no reason, and you would have to restart it. For some bizarre reason, you accept this.
  • You couldn’t have more than one person in the car unless you purchased a CarXP or Car NT, and then you would have to buy extra seats.
  • Linux would build a car that ran on water, was twice as reliable, and 10 times as fast, but would only run on 5% of the roads.
  • The oil, gas, alternator and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single “General Car Fault” light.
  • People would be excited about the ‘new’ features in Microsoft cars, forgetting that these features had been available in other cars a decade ago.
  • We’d all have to switch to Microsoft Gas.
  • The US Government would GET subsidies from Auto Manufacturers instead of GIVING them.
  • New seats would force everyone to get the same size butt!

Microsoft Tests Nuclear Device

Microsoft Tests Nuclear Device
at Secret Hanford Facility

REDMOND (BNN)–World leaders reacted with stunned silence as Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) conducted an underground nuclear test at a secret facility in eastern Washington state. The device, exploded at 9:22 am PDT (1622 GMT/12:22 pm EDT) today, was timed to coincide with talks between Microsoft and the US Department of Justice over possible antitrust action.

“Microsoft is going to defend its right to market its products by any and all necessary means,” said Microsoft CEO Bill Gates. “Not that I’m anti-government” he continued, “but there would be few tears shed in the computer industry if Washington were engulfed in a bath of nuclear fire.”

Scientists pegged the explosion at around 100 kilotons. “I nearly dropped my latte when I saw the seismometer” explained University of Washington geophysicist Dr. Whoops Blammover, “At first I thought it was Mt. Rainier, and I was thinking, damn, there goes the mountain bike vacation.”

In Washington, President Clinton announced the US Government would boycott all Microsoft products indefinitely. Minutes later, the President reversed his decision. “We’ve tried sanctions since lunchtime, and they don’t work,” said the President. Instead, the administration will initiate a policy of “constructive engagement” with Microsoft.

Microsoft’s Chief Technology Officer Nathan Myrhvold said the test justified Microsoft’s recent acquisition of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation from the US Government. Not only did Microsoft acquire “kilograms of weapons grade plutonium” in the deal, said Myrhvold, “but we’ve finally found a place to dump those millions of unsold copies of Microsoft Bob.”

Myrhvold warned users not to replace Microsoft NT products with rival operating systems. “I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of a radioisotope thermoelectric generator inside of every Pentium II microprocessor,” said Myrhvold, “but anyone who installs an OS written by a bunch of long-hairs on the Internet is going to get what they deserve.”

The existence of an RTG in each Pentium II microprocessor would explain why the microprocessors, made by the Intel Corporation, run so hot. The Intel chips “put out more heat than they draw in electrical power” said Prof. E. E. Thymes of MIT. “This should finally dispell those stories about cold fusion.”

Rumors suggest a second weapons development project is underway in California, headed by Microsoft rival Sun Microsystems. “They’re doing all of the development work in Java,” said one source close to the project. The development of a delivery system is said to be holding up progress. “Write once, bomb anywhere is still a dream at the moment.”

Meanwhile, in Cupertino, California, Apple interim-CEO Steve Jobs was rumored to be in discussion with Oracle CEO Larry Ellison about deploying Apple’s Newton technology against Microsoft. “Newton was the biggest bomb the Valley has developed in years,” said one hardware engineer. “I’d hate to be around when they drop that product a second time.”

Microsoft Buys 1998

In a surprise move, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates announced yesterday that he has purchased the entire calendar year of 1998. 1998 will be replaced instead by ‘Year-M’ to be followed by actual 1998. “Windows 98 was not going to ship on schedule,” Gates said. “But we couldn’t change the name, again… people were starting to get confused.”

“Instead of spending a lot of time and money on a new marketing campaign we decided just to buy 1998. That way we get an extra year to debug Windows and get it shipped for what will be the new 1998.”

Microsoft arranged this coup by leveraging its financial assets to bail out the Federal Government and pay off the national debt. “The IRS is being disbanded for next year, but taxes will be collected as usual with one change: all checks must be made payable to Bill Gates.”

A side benefit of this purchase is that Gates now owns the judicial branch for the duration of ‘Year-M.’ Speculators stated that Gates would likely use this opportunity to dismiss the numerous lawsuits pending against Microsoft. Gates apparently feels this would be cheaper than actually hiring lawyers to represent his rickety cases.

In a related story, God has filed suit against Gates because of his purchase, claiming time to be the sole property of God. In a countersuit, Gates claims God is a monopoly and demands that he be broken up into ‘deity conglomerates.’ “Gosh,” said Gates. “They broke up AT&T… why can’t we break up God?”

Inside sources at Microsoft said that Gates was looking for an early resolution to the suit by hiring God as a programmer. Evidently, God has the exact profile that Gates is looking for in a programmer: HE doesn’t mind rainy climates, doesn’t need any money, isn’t married, and can work for at least 6 days without sleeping. “If we could just get some employees like that,” Gates lamented, “we would be able to ship Windows 98 on time.”

If Microsoft was Jewish

  • Instead of getting a “General Protection Fault” error, your PC would get “Verklemmt”.
  • When you fill up your “C-drive”, you will get a “Hard Drive is Shtupped” message.
  • Hanukkah screen savers will have “Flying Draydles”.
  • Your PC shuts down automatically at sundown on Friday evenings.
  • CD-ROM’s would be rendered obsolete with the invention of high compression DVB’s (digital video bagels).
  • Your “Start” button would be replaced with a “Let’s go! I’m not getting any younger!” button.
  • “Abort, Retry, Ignore” would be replaced with “Stop it already – You’re killing me!, You vant I should try it again?, I didn’t hear that!”.
  • When disconnecting external devices from the back of your PC, you would be instructed to “Remove the cable from your PC’s toukches”.
  • Your multimedia player would be renamed to “Nu, so play my musical ready!”.
  • During Passover, your PC would not be able to read “leavened floppies”.
  • “Microsoft Word” would be renamed to “Microsoft Kibbitz”.
  • Microsoft Office would include “A little byte of this, and a little byte of that”.
  • When running “scandisk”, you will be prompted with a “You vant I should fix this?” message.
  • When your PC is working too hard, you would occasionally hear a loud “Oy!!!”.
  • A “monitor cleaning solution” from Manischewitz would advertise that it gets rid of the “schmootz” on your monitor.
  • After 20 minutes of no activity, your PC would go “Shloofie”
  • Computer viruses would now be cured with chicken soup.
  • Solitaire would be replaced with on-line “Bingo”or “Mah-Jong.”
  • Internet Explorer would now have a spinning “Star of David” in the upper right corner.
  • After your computer dies, you would dispose of it within 24 hours.
  • You would hear the tune “Hava Nagila” during startup.
  • “Year 2000” issues are replaced by “Year 5760-5761” issues.
  • Bill Gates’ official theme song would be “If I Were a Rich Man”.